Human Cloning Should Be Banned
Even though human cloning gives the opportunity for a potential parents to choose particular traits for their children, human cloning should strongly be banned because human cloning is ethically problematic, unacceptable, and it poses a large number of problems. In the 21st century, human cloning has becoming a common topic as technology advances. Though it has not happened yet, but it is in testing stages. Human cloning is the invention of a copy for an existing or originally existing human being that is genetically similar. The dilemma on whether or not human cloning should be legal is a highly charged one. Maybe even personal, based on one's moral position on the topic. And as the response is so closely connected to one's point of view, this dilemma cannot be addressed in a way that satisfies everyone. When the motive of cloning is to form an exact copy, if scientists clone a human that happens to be completely identical to the original, the question needs to be asked is, whether the cloned human is a different individual from the original and earns the same rights as any other human? Through human cloning, it gives you the opportunity and advantage to choose particular traits for your children. It means that it is possible to choose the gender, eye color and other traits. This is definitely an enormous benefit and a fantastic way to use science in a new positive light for human beings. However, human cloning has harmful, very bad impact towards the human beings as well as our future generations. Although genes are clearly identified as affecting actions and cognitive function, "genetically similar" does not mean completely similar; hardly anyone would refuse to accept that identical twins are different people, with separate thoughts and feelings, yet even with seeming to be natural human clones with identical DNA, and not intersecting characters entirely. The connection over an "original" and a clone, though unexciting it may sound, is also quite similar to that between identical twins raised apart; they share the same genes, however little of the same environment. Can a human be cloned? The answer is, strongly no. According to www.unifr.ch.html it is stated that, “on September 21, 2000, an American couple planning to pay $ 500,000 for a clone of their dead infant daughter to Las Vegas-based company called Clonaid. But at the end, none of the undertakings created has reported success.” This shows that there is hardly any verified human clone has been produced until today. If the human reproductive cloning begins, it is likely that the main method scientists would use is somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), which is the same method used to produce Dolly the sheep. Somatic nuclear transfer of cells (SCNT) begins when a female giver or donor takes the ovum and removes its nucleus, producing an enucleated egg. A cell containing the DNA is then taken from the individual who is in the process of being cloned. Then, the enucleated egg is implanted using electric power with the cell of the cloning subject. This produces an embryo that is implanted by in vitro fertilization towards a surrogate mother. If the method is effective, then at the end of a regular gestation period, the surrogate mother will give birth to a baby who is a copy of the cloning subject. According to www.upi.com it is stated that, “even if cloned human embryos are created successfully, the odds still are against further success, Robert Lanza (vice president of medical and scientific development at Advanced Cell Technology Inc., of Worcester, Mass) said. About 40 percent of the time, the embryos do not implant into the womb. Of those that do, only 10 percent to 20 percent will go to term and over 25 percent of these will not survive past birth, he said.” The statement above shows that the process of cloning is highly risky for all participants, especially the clone as results from past experiments of human cloning show that the success percentage of past cloning experiments are very low. These In fact, 80% - 90% of human cloning attempts have been labelled as "failure," and 10% - 20% of the cloned meaning that human DNA is only put at risk during the process. Human DNA could be infected, as mentioned before, there are very few chances of success. Human cloning is ethically unacceptable, because it poses a large number of significant problems that would arise from it. Human Cloning risks the possibility of shorten life because, since older cells are being used to form human copies, it is possible that the developing embryos can adopt their imprinted age, which then can create some difficulties of premature aging and possibly even premature death. Moreover, Most cloned children will live a life filled with hospital, medication, surgery, and experience tremendous pain, thus the cloning process is certainly too dangerous to attempt on human beings. This is because these clones may experience several birth defects or abnormalities such as significantly increased birth size, hepatic and brain defects, lung, kidney and cardiovascular issues, failure of the immune system and rapid unexplained death. Second, cloning a similar characteristics will reduce the size of the human gene pool over the time, causing devastating impact on human survival. Small gene pool populations are at greater threat of extinction than larger gene pools. This is because owning two or more genes in a population enables higher flexibility in the coping with the atmosphere or environment, as well as fighting diseases. Furthermore, human cloning could lead to the decreasing value of human’s life. cloning would promotes a knowledge of children and people as a whole, as something that can be designed and produced to have particular characteristics or traits. When human cloning is on the massive rise, human beings may very well become more of a commodity than an individual. Because parents don't really like the kids they've got, they'd then go clone another copy in the expectations of getting it ideal next time. It may also develop a new division of the society, in which ideal clones would be treated differently from those that are born naturally. Study and methods on human cloning could place the clones at inappropriate consequences like shortened life, poor health or any other unidentified issues. Ultimately, legalizing wide-ranging cloning might resulting to an insult for an individual's life on earth and the individual’s value, which might eventually diminish all human beings. It is concluded that cloning humans are totally wrong, with the technology at the moment potentially involving a large number of defective pregnancies to produce a single live baby clone. Evidence also shows that clones almost always have genetic defects developed-in and are bad for health, study and methods on human cloning could place the clones at inappropriate consequences like shortened life, poor health or any other unidentified dangerous issues. Perhaps it can also lead them to premature ageing and even death. They think that bringing kids into the world would be completely wrong, realizing they could be impacted by these issues. With human life's respect and genetic diversity at risk and threat, individuals may unwillingly be copied, leaving millions of cells around every day as they go through their normal lives shedding skin. Ultimately, legalizing wide-ranging cloning might resulting to an insult for an individual's life on earth and the individual’s value, which might eventually diminish all human beings There really is no reliable information about who will have the power to control over who gets cloned, and firms are already earning money from collecting deceased partners and children's tissues until the time when human cloning becomes commonly available.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |